Showing posts with label University of St. Thomas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label University of St. Thomas. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

"Does God Need the Church?" - Reflection #1...


I am currently reading Lohfink's "Does God Need the Church?" in an Ecclesiology course at UST. Here is my first impression based on the first two sections:

The first night of class was very interesting (Dr. Bill Cavanaugh is my professor). All conversation based, which is
good; Cavanaugh does help the discussion move along productively. He seems like a
good guy. Lohfink's book is very interesting and very challenging. I really enjoy the historical critical method from the standpoint of reconciling my faith with pure reason, but it only goes to a certain point. Lohfink goes on diatribes about how bad 'religion' is and how you only need faith. I understand that he's getting at 'not going through the motions' but he takes it a bit far. Also, he overplays the historical critical methodand imposes on the Biblical authors too much sociology; certainly the authors were telling their 'history' in light of the Babylonian Exile as well as trying to understand their identity, but if it's all sociology/archaeology that can explain everything then what is God actually doing that's unique to Israel? I have issues with this. It is as if miracles are all out of the question (regarding the birth of Isaac, Lohfink remarks "the author doesn't care about the miracle of the birth, but..."). Lohfink proposes that God created the world and the world had the 'freedom' to generate itself: plants, animals, man all are 'generated' from the earth because of freedom. Good to underline freedom, but it makes God like a clock-maker, who sits back and watches freedom unfold. Lohfinks bowing to the calf of 'evolution' also does not allow for humanity to be a unique species created in God's image and likeness; to Lohfink, man simply eventually happened out of freedom. I'm not a fan of that; maybe I'm a fundamentalist. As Lohfink speaks about the complexity of how Israel engaged with the Cannanites and Egyptians and how Israel is related to "El" the Canaanite God, one wonders how the 'sociology' approach portrays how anything is different for Israel. Why is Israel special? How do they obtain the Torah (which Lohfink insists gives freedom) without the miracle of obtaining faith? No Exodus, no burning bush, no miracle births, no sacrifice of Isaac story, no Ark? What gives?? I understand that 'scandal' that God has always entrusted his message to man to isseminate to other men, but didn't that have to begin with God revealing himself in a profound and miraculous way? Lohfink seems more interested in reconciling his deas to science and archaology and sociology than to Tradition, which is nderstandable.
To conclude, Lohfink suggests that the Law and the identity of the people help them
to 'gather' the people of God into the Church; I agree, but my question is how do I
reconcile the great importance of identity (liturgy etc.) with how Lohfink explains everything via the empirical? AKA: why is Eucharistic Adoration, Confession, Mass, devotion to Mary and saints important if it's all a product of sociology, and 'religion' is bad? This is where my undies get in a bunch. It is clear that the Church is worse-off when we dumb-down Tradition, and make everything generic, losing our identity and rich culture; also, true ecumenism is hurting due to so much ignorance about our own Catholic faith. Yet, we've only read 2 chapters; he hasn't discussed the New Testament at all... maybe the answer lies there.

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

A year of friction, growth at St. Thomas under President, Father Dennis Dease

[from Stella Borealis]
The university's president faced criticism from several quarters, but fundraising has never been brisker.

In 16 years, the University of St. Thomas has grown from a local liberal arts college to a nationally recognized institution. This year, a record number of undergraduates enrolled, and there are more applications from would-be Tommies than ever before.

In October, the largest private school in Minnesota announced a $500 million fundraising drive, kicked off with the largest single gift to a college or university in state history.

The successes are a testament to the ambition and fundraising prowess of the Catholic priest who oversaw it all, the Rev. Dennis Dease, the university's president. Yet for Dease, holiday break couldn't come soon enough.

Dease was panned by many for stifling free speech on campus when he made what he later admitted was a wrongheaded decision not to invite Nobel Peace Prize laureate Desmond Tutu to speak. Then came a series of racist threats against three black undergraduates that dredged up memories of past racial incidents at St. Thomas, and criticism that the school was betraying its Catholic heritage by eliminating an automatic trustee position for the local archbishop.

"If you fly, you know you're going to hit some turbulence," Dease said in a recent interview. "You just hope it's not going to be pure turbulence. There was a period this fall when you wondered when we were going to reach the smooth altitude."

Some of the scrutiny is an inevitable byproduct of the university's rising profile. But some say it goes deeper, to Dease's struggle to navigate the often conflicting demands of big-money donors, Catholics eager to preserve St. Thomas' religious identity, and faculty members espousing tolerance and openness to a wide range of views.

Some say Dease's missteps on the Tutu situation, which he said were a result of not listening to opposing views, were symptomatic of a closed-door leadership style.

"I think it would be wrong to suggest that St. Thomas is having these issues only because it's a Catholic school," said David Landry, a theology professor. "We have them more than most other schools have them. Most other Catholic schools wouldn't have balked at having Tutu on campus. It was uniquely a St. Thomas issue."

Dease's accomplishments

The College of St. Thomas was founded in St. Paul in 1885 as a seminary and soon shifted its focus to liberal arts education for young men. Since then, it has grown to offer graduate degrees in business, law and liberal arts, become a co-ed university and added a campus in Minneapolis.

In 1991, Dease, a professor at St. Thomas who was rector at the Basilica of St. Mary, took over with an ambition to create "a truly great urban university," such as Harvard or Boston College. Under his leadership, St. Thomas has greatly expanded its academic offerings into new areas, such as engineering and entrepreneurship.

This year, Dease has turned his attention to fixing the school's biggest weakness: its bank account. St. Thomas' endowment amounted to just more than $300 million in mid-2006, $200 million less than the endowments at two smaller colleges, Carleton and Macalester, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education.

While the "Opening Doors" campaign will build a new student center, much of the half-billion dollars will be invested, with the interest used to pay for new programs, hire top-notch faculty members and administrators, and provide student financial aid.

"I want to ensure that no student that has the ability is turned away from St. Thomas for financial reasons," Dease said.

When St. Thomas kicked off the fundraising drive in October, it had already raised $310 million -- including an anonymous gift of $50 million and a staggering $60 million from Lee and Penny Anderson.

Bruce Flessner, a fundraising consultant for St. Thomas, said the university's transformation and success in fundraising have been remarkable.

"They're very good at telling a dream and being able to deliver on it," Flessner said. "They've been very good at establishing a club of donors who push each other."

St. Thomas is backed by heavy hitters in the business community. Included on the school's 43-member board of trustees are Target Corp. chairman and CEO Robert Ulrich, Best Buy chairman Richard Schulze, broadcasting magnate Stanley Hubbard, KPMG International chairman Timothy Flynn, lawyer and U.S. Senate candidate Michael Ciresi, and 3M chairman and CEO George Buckley.

"The board is extremely strong. If we've had a secret weapon, that would be in the running," Dease said. "They're very seasoned, talented and they've helped us see a little further down the road than we would normally be able to."

Faculty concerns

Even as the university's reputation and finances have grown, faculty members have watched with concern as Dease's administration focused on raising money and reassuring Catholics that St. Thomas isn't becoming secular.

Leigh Lawton is a business professor who was involved in a 2005 dispute with the university about whether unmarried couples should be allowed to travel together with students.

"We're not Catholic enough for some people," Lawton said. "But if you become less tolerant and adhere more tightly to some of the tenets of the church, you're moving away from what some people see as the role of an academic institution."

There is a natural tension between the faculty and administration, but many current and former St. Thomas faculty members said what had been a working relationship has deteriorated in the past few years.

The school is in the midst of a "climate study," and Landry expects faculty morale will be at an all-time low.

"We have tremendous problems here," Landry said. "That's not to say that everything is bad; there are a lot of good things about St. Thomas, but there are a lot of people here who are demoralized.

"There have been a bunch of decisions where the faculty was opposed, the staff was opposed and the students were opposed to and it seemed the donors were in favor," he said, which has led to worries that St. Thomas is being steered by donors.

In 2005, a campus visit from conservative lightning rod Ann Coulter resulted in debate on campus that Dease said "tested the limits of civility." This fall, Dease thought he could avoid a similar controversy by opting against hosting the PeaceJam event that will feature Tutu. Dease worried that the South African Anglican archbishop's comments on Israel might offend Jews.

The outcry over Dease's decision made him think twice.

"The Archbishop Tutu experience was humbling. It's a little embarrassing," Dease said. "There was a good cross-section of people that I respected who were all saying, 'Dease, you're wrong.' That gets your attention."

Less than a month after Dease changed course on Tutu, three black women living in the John Paul II dorm were subjected to a series of racial slurs and threatening words that resulted in a security guard being posted outside their door.

Dease's initial reaction was a combination of sadness, disgust and, "Oh, not again."

The last was the result of several race-bias incidents in recent years at St. Thomas, including two others this year.

Administrators say the incidents are not evidence that the campus is an intolerant place.

Said Mark Dienhart, St. Thomas' chief administrative officer: "When you have 11,000-plus students and 1,800 employees, unfortunately you're going to have some knuckleheads in the group. ... We don't create folks like that." StarTribune